Pics of girls that are TOO young

(1/4) > >>

runnun:
Come on seriously, some of these girls look maybe 12-13... even 15
This girl is like 15 or 16 call me crazy but most of the men here are obviously turned on by fit WOMEN... posting picture little girls just becomes creepy.  I honestly think it isn't even right that it be posted
Especially when comments float around that lean towards a sexual nature...  Is there not an age limit of pics for the women... It's a sick world everyone knows it is but thats just disgusting... My point and case is this forum does have links to nudity so then the site does... I like fit WOMEN I think its apparent, but little girls?  That's wrong and disgusting.  You can't trust people, definately not on the internet.  I read that it was against the rules to post pictures of women that look just too young.  So why isn't it being reinforced?  Sure gymnasts can look alot younger then they really are.  But honestly.  It's creepy something should be done about people breaking the rules.  These young women are being RATED on a scale of 1 to 10... I'm a guy I rate something high I not only find them pretty but sexually attractive... Try to say men arent this way so I can call you a liar.  I doubt a male is going to rate a woman on her respective ability to have muscle... I think my point is made there is no reason to drag on...  A few pictures of girls that I will gurantee are under age. Last I knew it was completely illegal to post pictures of children on sites that contain or give resource to nudity.

http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=4300   14 years old.
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=13230 can't be older then 16
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=10933 looks to be maybe 14-15
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=8852 12-15 max
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=7838 Highschoolers
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=6401 Highschoolers AGAIN
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=2770 Early to mid teens

anon-e-mouse:
You need to go check out this topic which has been cussed and discussed before. Look under MultiMedia>Pictures, pg. 2, last item: MOVED: Thoughts On Content?

Ursus:
If all the privates are covered up I really don't see what the problem is.   It's not illegal to look at an otherwise clothed 16 year old girl flexing her bicep. 

PaulD:
I don't look at all muscular women with a sexual intent, perhaps that is a failing of yours - but not everyone.  I also agree that little girls (or boys) should not be on sites like this.

Chainer:
I've already made lengthier posts about this, so I'll just address some of the points you made:

Quote from: runnun on July 15, 2009, 08:11:57 pm

Last I knew it was completely illegal to post pictures of children on sites that contain or give resource to nudity.

False on the illegal part. I might agree with you and think it odd if pictures of children were to be on the same page as the links to nudity (which has happened once, and I deleted the nudity link). However, on this site (which I'm defining to be girlswithmuscle.com and forum.girlswithmuscle.com), any pictures of minors are on different pages, and in a different context, than links to nudity. Also note that nudity isn't allowed on the main site.

Quote

I read that it was against the rules to post pictures of women that look just too young. ... It's creepy something should be done about people breaking the rules.
It's against my rules to post images of children on the main site. In the past week or so I rejected about 20-30 uploaded images of girls who looked like they were less than 11-12 from appearing on the main site. Also, a 15-year-old is not a child.

Quote

These young women are being RATED on a scale of 1 to 10... I'm a guy I rate something high I not only find them pretty but sexually attractive...

Ratings can be based on any number of things other than sexual attractiveness, including muscle definition, size, etc. I suppose all of us rate images based on slightly varying criteria; this site is about girls with muscle, nothing more or less.

Quote

http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=4300   14 years old.
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=13230 can't be older then 16
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=10933 looks to be maybe 14-15
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=8852 12-15 max
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=7838 Highschoolers
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=6401 Highschoolers AGAIN
http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/imgpage.html?imgid=2770 Early to mid teens
I'm willing to bet that quite a few people still in high school browsing this site appreciate images like this.

I apologize for any curtness, but it does bother me a bit when self-appointed morality police come and throw around words like "disgusting" and "illegal" in an attempt to control what people should and should not be looking at.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page